Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40194916›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2025

Enhancing Viability in Static and Perfused 3D Tissue Constructs Using Sacrificial Gelatin Microparticles.

Andrew R Hudson, Daniel J Shiwarski, Alec J Kramer, Adam W Feinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew R HudsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Daniel J ShiwarskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6978-303X
Alec J KramerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-7920-4240
Adam W FeinbergDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3338-5456

Funding

Development of a Collagen-based 3D Bioprinted Microfluidic Platform for Vascular Tissue Engineering and Disease ModelingK99HL155777 · NHLBI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SHIWARSKI, DANIEL J · 2021 to 2022
$222k
3D Printed Collagen Tracheal Scaffolds with Biomimetic MicrostructureF30HL154728 · NHLBI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI TASHMAN, JOSHUA · 2020 to 2022
$134k
NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL154728NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL155777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current limitations in engineered tissues arise from the inability to provide sufficient nutrients to cells deep within constructs, restricting their viability. This study focuses on enhancing diffusion by creating a microporous microenvironment using gelatin microparticles within collagen scaffolds. By leveraging the FRESH (Freeform Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogels) 3D bioprinting technique, gelatin microparticles are utilized both as a support material and as a thermoresponsive porogen to establish interconnected pores. The results indicate that scaffolds with 75% porosity significantly increase diffusion rates and cell viability, extending beyond the conventional ∼200 μm limit. Additionally, integrating vascular-like channels with porous scaffolds and applying perfusion improved nutrient transport, leading to enhanced cell survival in larger constructs. This combination of microporosity and perfusion represents a promising approach to create thicker tissues without necrotic regions, potentially paving the way for scalable tissue engineering applications. The findings suggest that optimizing pore sizes and scaffold perfusion can bridge the gap between rapid tissue formation and slower vascularization processes, enabling the future development of functional tissue constructs at clinically relevant scales.

Indexed as

GelatinTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBioprintingCell SurvivalHumansHydrogelsPerfusionPorosityPrinting, Three-DimensionalGelatinHydrogelsbioprintingperfusionporogenscaffoldtissue engineeringviability

Identifiers

PMID40194916
PMCPMC12076283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.