ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Improving uptake of telemedicine (phone/video consult): methods and lessons learnt.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine can improve care delivery through reducing clinic wait-time, improving accessibility to specialist care, minimising cross-infection risk at patient's convenience. Despite these benefits, telemedicine uptake remained low within our gastroenterology department, with only four teleconsultations conducted in 6 months prior to this project's conceptualisation. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to improve telemedicine utilisation within our department by 20% over a 3-month period. Surveys conducted during the planning phase identified key barriers to telemedicine adoption, including high clinic load, concerns over medicolegal issues and unfamiliarity with data security protocols. To address these issues, a multistakeholder QI team introduced several key measures, including streamlining telemedicine workflow, providing clinician training and implementing patient educational posters. These interventions successfully increased the adoption of telemedicine (median 8 (IQR 2.5) vs 31 (IQR 13) teleconsultations per month, p<0.01) over the intervention period, with 84% of patients reporting positive experiences. Additionally, this project reduced carbon emissions, saving approximately 3446 kg of CO2, equivalent to 388 gallons of gasoline. This QI project highlights the potential for telemedicine to enhance healthcare delivery while promoting environmental sustainability. Key lessons include the importance of structured workflows and stakeholder engagement to overcome barriers. Future interventions should aim to refine telemedicine pricing models and expand the initiative to other departments within the hospital to ensure long-term sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.