ArticleBMJ open2025
Incidence, risk factors and airway management of postoperative haematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective nested case-control study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for symptomatic hematoma following cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Retropharyngeal hematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery: a narrative review.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, risk factors and airway management of postoperative haematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS).
designA retrospective nested case-control study.
settingA tertiary hospital in China.
participantsA total of 13 523 patients within a single-centre longitudinal ACSS cohort were identified from March 2013 to February 2022. Patients with postoperative haematoma after ACSS were enrolled as the haematoma group, and others in the cohort without haematoma were randomly selected as the non-haematoma group by individually matching with the same operator, same gender, same surgery year and similar age (±5 years) at a ratio of 4:1. Subsequently, patients with haematoma were included in a subgroup for analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative haematoma and difficult intubation prior to haematoma evacuation.
resultsThe incidence of postoperative haematoma out of all ACSS was 0.4% (55/13 523). A total of 275 patients were enrolled in the study, including 55 patients in the haematoma group and 220 patients in the non-haematoma group. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) (OR 2.459; 95% CI 1.302 to 4.642; p =0.006) and the maximum mean arterial pressure (MAP) during recovery (OR 1.030; 95% CI 1.003 to 1.058; p =0.028) were identified as independent risk factors for haematoma. In the subgroup analysis, 29% of patients with haematoma experienced difficult intubation, and retropharyngeal haematoma (OR 10.435; 95% CI 1.249 to 87.144; p =0.030) was identified as an independent risk factor for difficult intubation. Patients with haematoma had longer hospitalisation duration (p <0.001) and greater costs associated with their stay (p <0.001).
conclusionACCF and elevated maximum MAP during the recovery period were independent risk factors for postoperative haematoma following ACSS. Patients with post-ACSS haematoma are at high risk of a difficult airway, with retropharyngeal haematoma being strongly associated with challenging airway management. Postoperative haematoma was associated with longer hospitalisation duration and greater costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: China Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2400086263.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.