ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Carotid Plaque-RADS: Inter- and Intrareader Agreement and Learning Curve Analysis in CTA.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of the Carotid Plaque-RADS Classification System in Ultrasound: Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement Analysis and Learning Curve Analysis.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Inter-reader agreement in multimodality imaging of carotid plaque-RADS: considerations for modality selection.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Thrombus composition identifies distinct etiologic phenotypes in embolic stroke of undetermined source.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- The predictive value of Plaque-RADS classification in two-dimensional carotid ultrasound for stroke risk stratification.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAtherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries is a major cause of ischemic stroke. Traditionally, the degree of stenosis has been regarded as the primary parameter for predicting stroke risk, but emerging evidence highlights the importance of carotid plaque composition and morphology. Recently, the Carotid Plaque-Reporting and Data System (RADS) has been introduced to standardize carotid plaque assessment beyond the degree of carotid stenosis. However, its reliability in routine radiologic practice has yet to be established. This study assesses the interreader agreement, intrareader agreement, and learning curve associated with Carotid Plaque-RADS. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, 500 subjects who underwent CTA for suspected carotid atherosclerosis were assessed. Three readers with varying experience levels in vascular imaging independently evaluated all CTAs in 5 blocks by using Carotid Plaque-RADS. To assess the impact of reader experience and potential improvement over time, interreader agreement between the 3 pairs of readers was calculated for each block by using Cohen κ, enabling a comparison of agreement sequentially across the blocks. Intrareader agreement was calculated on a random block of 100 patients (192 carotid arteries).
resultsAfter exclusion of low-quality examinations, 490 patients were selected for analysis, but 46 carotid arteries were excluded due to previous revascularization procedures. The remaining 934 carotid arteries were assessed. The agreement was substantial between expert and intermediate readers, ranging from κ = 0.78 to κ = 0.88, moderate between intermediate and beginner readers, ranging from κ = 0.50 to κ = 0.74, and between expert and beginner improved from substantial (κ = 0.68) to almost optimal (κ = 0.86) across blocks, indicating the effect of a learning curve. The interreader percent agreement was best for Plaque-RADS category 1, 2, and 3 and poorest for 4. Intrareader agreement was substantial for the beginner (κ = 0.77) and almost perfect for both the intermediate and expert readers (κ = 0.88).
conclusionsIn the CTA application of the Carotid Plaque-RADS, interreader agreement is substantial to near perfect among experienced and intermediate readers, with a notable learning curve for beginners. Intrareader agreement is almost perfect in experienced and intermediate readers, indicating consistency of their grading, ensuring data reproducibility by using Carotid Plaque-RADS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.