ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2025
Mortality and cancer incidence among Queensland coal mine workers: a retrospective cohort.
Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does your job really matter? Job-specific cancer incidence among a cohort coal mine workers in Queensland, Australia.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2026Article
- Are mortality rates similar between jobs in the Queensland coal mine workers' cohort?BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo quantify mortality and cancer incidence among Queensland coal mine workers.
methodsA cohort of coal mine workers from Queensland was linked to Australian national death and cancer registries for the period 1983-2020. Standardised mortality (SMR) and cancer incidence (SIR) ratios were calculated for men and women compared with Australian rates. Accidental deaths, suicides and melanoma incidence were also compared with Queensland rates.
resultsThere were 4957 deaths among 164 622 men and 211 among 24 389 women. Overall mortality was lower than the national population for men (SMR 81 (95% CI 78 to 83)) and women (SMR 75 (95% CI 65 to 86)) and for all mine types. Mortality was significantly decreased for most death categories. Male suicide mortality was significantly increased compared with the national population, but not when compared with Queensland population rates.There were 5492 men and 406 women with cancer. Overall cancer incidence was higher than the national population for men (SIR 107 (95% CI 104 to 109)) but not for women (SIR 99 (95% CI 90 to 108)). There were increased risks for melanoma, lip, lung, bladder and gallbladder cancers compared with the general Australian population for men and women, but the numbers of women were small. When compared with Queensland rates, the overall risk of melanoma was not increased.
conclusionsConsistent with the healthy worker effect, overall mortality was lower in this cohort. Cancer incidence was increased for men, but not women. The increased cancer risks highlight the need for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.