ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
High-risk HPV prevalence in the Czech cervical cancer screening population: a comparison of clinician-collected and self-collected sampling.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04133610 (HPVPro Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HPVPro Study: Comparison of HPV Detection in Clinician-collected Cervical Swabs and Self-sampled Cervicovaginal Swabs
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The incidence of high-risk HPV infections in Slovakia at the start of the national organized screening for cervical cancer.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) types varies across countries, making it essential to estimate prevalence using nationwide samples. Data on hrHPV prevalence in the Czech Republic are very limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of various hrHPV types in an unselected screening population of Czech women aged 30-65 years, using paired clinician-obtained cervical swab (CS) and self-collected cervicovaginal swabs (CVS). A total of 1026 eligible women were recruited into two study arms. In arm A, the digene® HC2 DNA Collection Device was used for both CS and CVS. In arm B, the Evalyn Brush was used for CVS, while the Cervex Brush was used for CS. All samples were tested for hrHPV using the digene® HC2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test and genotyped with the PapilloCheck® HPV-Screening assay. The overall hrHPV prevalence was 14.8%, based on positive results from either CVS or CS samples. hrHPV positivity was detected in 10.8% of clinician-obtained CSs and 11.8% of self-collected CVSs. A combined analysis of CS and CVS samples identified the five most prevalent hrHPV genotypes: HPV16, HPV31, HPV39, HPV56, and HPV68. The comparison of hrHPV detection in paired CS and CVS samples showed an overall concordance of 93%. These findings highlight the importance of detecting hrHPV genotypes alongside conventional Pap testing in national cervical screening programs. Furthermore, the results confirm that self-sampling kits represent a suitable alternative to clinician-collected samples. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT04133610).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.