ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Travel medicine providers' opinions on the dengue vaccine TAK-003 as a travel vaccine and the need for decision-support information and materials before its launch in Japan.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- State of the Art on Vaccine Development Against Dengue Infection: Scoping Review of the Literature.Infectious disease reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
TAK-003 is a dengue vaccine introduced in dengue-endemic countries and considered for travelers. Although not yet approved in Japan, inquiries from travelers are increasing. With limited evidence about vaccine use for travelers, consolidated expert opinions would aid in vaccination decision-making. Therefore, this study examined the opinions on TAK-003 and the need for decision-support information and materials among travel medicine providers before its launch in Japan. Participants recruited from the Japanese Society of Travel and Health were assessed on their intention to receive TAK-003 themselves when visiting dengue-endemic areas, and their intention to recommend it to travelers, with responses provided separately for short- and long-term travels. Participants who did not recommend TAK-003 provided reasons using multiple-choice questions. All participants were asked about their need for supporting information to aid in vaccination decision-making. Among the 154 respondents, over half intended to receive (55% for short-term, 75% for long-term) and recommend (53% for short-term, 75% for long-term) the vaccination. The primary reasons for not recommending it were concerns about efficacy and safety, which were also the most requested support information. These findings suggest that many travel medicine providers have positive opinions on TAK-003 as a travel vaccine and need decision-support information and materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.