ReviewThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
Tuberculosis parenteral therapeutic regimens for critical patients or non-functional intestinal tract: Brief review and proposal of protocol.
Review in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard anti-tuberculosis regimens (Rifampicin, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide, and Ethambutol [RHZE]) remain challenging for critically ill patients and those with a non-functioning gastrointestinal tract. In Brazil, these challenges are amplified by the lack of Intravenous (IV) rifampicin, isoniazid, and ethambutol, which often results in suboptimal outcomes. This brief communication synthesized evidence on parenteral therapies and proposed a structured, five-step protocol for critically ill patients unable to receive oral drugs. A narrative review of the guidelines and key studies was also conducted. IV formulations of RHZE are approved in only some countries and are not available everywhere. Alternative IV drug classes, such as fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, carbapenems, and oxazolidinones, can address malabsorption or intolerance to oral RHZE. However, no standardized regimen exists for this population. Our five-step protocol advises: (1) Characterizing each TB case, (2) determining IV necessity, (3) Consulting specialized TB services, (4) Designing a safe and effective regimen, and (5) Re-evaluating therapy for transition to oral treatment. Given the morbidity and mortality from severe TB in Intensive Care Units (ICU), a formalized approach is essential. Further research and policy initiatives regarding IV first-line drugs are crucial to improve treatment outcomes in this vulnerable group. This strategy unifies practice across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.