ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Applications of the SpineJack device in the surgical management of type A4 lumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType A4 lumbar burst fractures are severe spinal injuries typically treated with posterior pedicle screw constructs, with or without corpectomy. However, traditional approaches can be highly invasive and are often limited in their ability to reconstruct the anterior column. The SpineJack device offers a minimally invasive alternative or complement to posterior fixation. OBSERVATIONS: Four neurologically intact patients with lumbar type A4 fractures were treated using the SpineJack device, either alone or in combination with different posterior fixation techniques. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the 1-year follow-up. The procedure led to significant pain relief and rapid mobilization for all patients. Radiologically, it restored vertebral body height (VBH), increased spinal canal patency, and corrected preoperative deformities, with minimal loss of correction at follow-up. LESSONS: The SpineJack device is a viable, less invasive alternative to traditional pedicle screw constructs and serves as an effective adjunct for stabilization, potentially replacing corpectomy in some cases. It restores VBH and alignment, maintains load-bearing capacity, and reduces the need for additional hardware. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes, especially in younger patients. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24821.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.