ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Anticipated Acceptability of Blended Learning Among Lay Health Care Workers in Malawi: Qualitative Analysis Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of a Blended Learning Training Approach for Health Care Workers Conducting HIV Index Case Testing in Malawi: Secondary Economic Analysis of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- Effect of a digital training package on clinical outcomes in Malawi's index case testing programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ global health · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: HIV index case testing (ICT) aims to identify people living with HIV and their contacts, engage them in HIV testing services, and link them to care. ICT implementation has faced challenges in Malawi due to limited counseling capacity among lay health care workers (HCWs). Enhancing capacity through centralized face-to-face training is logistically complex and expensive. A decentralized blended learning approach to HCW capacity-building, combining synchronous face-to-face and asynchronous digital modalities, may be an acceptable way to address this challenge. Objective: The objective of this analysis is to describe factors influencing HCW anticipated acceptability of blended learning using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Methods: This formative qualitative study involved conducting 26 in-depth interviews with HCWs involved in the ICT program across 14 facilities in Machinga and Balaka, Malawi (November-December 2021). Results were analyzed thematically using TAM. Themes were grouped into factors affecting the 2 sets of TAM constructs: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Results: A total of 2 factors influenced perceived usefulness. First, HCWs found the idea of self-guided digital learning appealing, as they believed it would allow for reinforcement, which would facilitate competence. They also articulated the need for opportunities to practice and receive feedback through face-to-face interactions in order to apply the digital components. In total, 5 factors influenced perceived ease of use. First, HCWs expressed a need for orientation to the digital technology given limited digital literacy. Second, they requested accessibility of devices provided by their employer, as many lacked personal devices. Third, they wished for adequate communication surrounding their training schedules, especially if they were going to be asynchronous. Fourth, they wished for support for logistical arrangements to avoid work interruptions. Finally, they wanted monetary compensation to motivate learning, a practice comparable with offsite trainings. Conclusions: A decentralized blended learning approach may be an acceptable method of enhancing ICT knowledge and skills among lay HCWs in Malawi, although a broad range of external factors need to be considered. Our next step is to integrate these findings into a blended learning package and examine perceived acceptability of the package in the context of a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.