Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40194263›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2025

Use of Job Exposure Matrices to Inform COVID-19 Vaccine Promotion Among Non-Health Care Workers in Chicago, Illinois.

Frances R Lendacki, Linda Forst, Supriya D Mehta, Janna L Kerins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frances R LendackiFrom the Chicago Department of Public Health, Disease Control Bureau, Chicago, Illinois (F.R.L., J.L.K.); School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (F.R.L., L.F., S.D.M.); and Division of Infectious Disease Medicine, Department of Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois (S.D.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-1167-8709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupation, a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 exposure, is excluded from immunization records. Identifying undervaccinated workers could optimize interventions to protect vulnerable populations.

methodsWe analyzed health department case interviews (June 2021 to May 2022) to describe 3763 non-health care workers with COVID-19 in Chicago. Job exposure matrices categorized SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk through frequency of indoor work and proximity to the public and to coworkers. Logistic regression quantified associations between occupational risk and vaccination status.

resultsPre-Omicron vaccination rates were lower among high-risk versus lower-risk workers (41% vs. 49%). Post-Omicron rates did not differ (75%). Undervaccinated groups had disproportionately high occupational risk: 66% of Black-non-Latinx, 57% of 18- to 29-year-olds. Demographically adjusted models found no associations between occupational risk and vaccination.

conclusionsGiven demographic patterns of employment, workplace-based COVID-19 vaccine promotion can help reach undervaccinated communities. To inform interventions, immunization records must include occupation.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PromotionOccupational ExposureAdolescentAdultChicagoFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationWorkplaceYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccinesjob exposure matrixnon–health care workersoccupational healthSARS-CoV-2vaccine promotion

Identifiers

PMID40194263
PMCPMC12129396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.