ArticleNucleic acids research2025
In vivo nucleotide excision repair by mycobacterial UvrD1 requires ATP hydrolysis but does not depend on cysteine disulfide-mediated dimerization and DNA unwinding.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mycobacterial UvrD1 is an SF1-type ATPase that participates in nucleotide excision repair (NER). UvrD1 consists of N-terminal ATPase and C-terminal Tudor domains. The monomeric UvrD1 characterized originally displays vigorous DNA-dependent ATPase activity but only feeble helicase activity. A recent study demonstrated that: (i) cysteine disulfide-mediated homodimerization of UvrD1 generates a highly active helicase; and (ii) an obligate monomeric UvrD1 (by virtue of mutating the domain 2B cysteine) is active as an ATP-dependent 3'-to-5' single-stranded DNA translocase but not as a double-stranded DNA-unwinding helicase. Here we test genetically which physical and functional states of UvrD1 are relevant for its functions in DNA repair, by complementation of an NER-defective Mycobacterium smegmatis ΔuvrD1 strain with a series of biochemically-defined UvrD1 mutants. By assaying complemented strains for sensitivity to UVC, MMC, cisplatin, and psoralen-UVA, we conclude that monomeric UvrD1 ATPase activity suffices for the NER functions of UvrD1 in vivo. Decoupling ATP hydrolysis from duplex unwinding does not affect the repair activity of UvrD1, nor does interdiction of domain 2B cysteine disulfide-mediated dimerization or deletion of the Tudor domain. Our results militate against a proposed model in which UvrD1's repair function is governed by the redox state of the bacterium via its impact on UvrD1 dimerization and helicase activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.