Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193670›Full record

ReviewMedicine2025

Intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric cataract surgery: A narrative review.

Bogumiła Wójcik-Niklewska, Martyna Nocoń-Bratek, Klaudia Szala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bogumiła Wójcik-NiklewskaDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6753-2904
Martyna Nocoń-BratekProfessor Kornel Gibiński University Hospital Center, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Klaudia SzalaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Students' Scientific Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0009-0007-7715-8024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital cataract is a lens opacification that disrupts normal visual development, requiring early surgical intervention to prevent amblyopia. In children, timely surgery, followed by optical correction and vision rehabilitation, is crucial for achieving binocular vision with foveal fixation. The recommended surgical timing is within 8 weeks for unilateral cases and by 4 months for bilateral cases to minimize long-term visual impairment. Despite advancements in intraocular lens (IOL) technology and ophthalmic microsurgery, accurate IOL power selection in pediatric patients remains a challenge due to axial length growth, biometric variability, and the reliance on formulas derived from adult models. These factors contribute to postoperative refractive errors, making proper formula selection essential in minimizing additional corrective interventions. Traditional third-generation formulas, such as the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff-T and Holladay 1, are commonly used in pediatric cases. However, recent studies suggest that Barrett Universal II offers greater accuracy in older children, owing to its advanced vergence-based algorithm and improved axial length prediction. Emerging formulas, including Hill-RBF 3.0 and Kane, show promise but require further validation in pediatric cohorts. Additionally, ocular growth dynamics must be accounted for when determining postoperative refractive targets. Younger children often require undercorrection to compensate for axial elongation, and biometric formulas must be chosen accordingly to optimize long-term outcomes. The lack of pediatric-specific formulas further complicates IOL selection, emphasizing the need for new models that integrate machine learning algorithms and growth prediction data.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionLenses, IntraocularBiometryChildHumansaphakiachildrencongenital cataractintraocular lenspseudophakia

Identifiers

PMID40193670
PMCPMC11977731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.