ArticleMedicine2025
Analysis of hydrogen sulfide-related signatures of breast cancer identified 2 distinct subtypes: Implications for individualized therapeutics.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a vital gasotransmitter involved in breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis. This study aims to employ hydrogen sulfide-related genes (HSRGs) for molecular classification of BC and, accordingly, to establish a robust prognostic risk signature. Transcriptomic, clinical, and mutational data of BC patients were collected from the cancer genome atlas and gene expression omnibus databases. Prognostic relevance was evaluated using Cox regression analysis, while consensus clustering analysis was employed for molecular subtyping. Gene expression profiles, prognosis, immune infiltration patterns, drug sensitivity, and response to immunotherapy were compared between subtypes. Multiple-gene prognostic features were developed and assessed along with a nomogram. The gene expression was validated in clinical samples using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Among 282 HSRGs, 46 exhibited significant correlations with BC prognosis. Consensus clustering identified 2 distinct molecular subtypes (C1 and C2). C1 displayed significantly improved prognosis compared to C2, accompanied by increased infiltration of B cells, T cells, monocytes, and mast cells but decreased macrophage infiltration. Moreover, C1 demonstrated higher drug sensitivity and immunotherapeutic response relative to C2. Enrichment analysis revealed suppressed immune-related processes and pathways in C2 while cell cycle regulation and chromosomal processes were significantly activated. Additionally, a risk feature comprising 6 differentially expressed genes between subtypes was constructed; this feature performed well in prognostic prediction. Integration of this feature with other clinical parameters (radiotherapy/chemotherapy status, clinical stage, N stage) into a nomogram further enhanced prognostic accuracy. Clinical samples further validated the high expression of ATP13A5, LRTM2, MAFA, and SPDYC and the low expression of CYP4F12 and TNN in BC. Our findings highlight the clinical relevance of HSRGs in BC, providing a basis for precise molecular classification and prognosis evaluation. The developed risk feature and nomogram offer practical tools for guiding personalized treatment strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.