Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193526›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Classroom network structure learning engagement and parallel temporal attention LSTM based knowledge tracing.

Zhaoyu Shou, Yihong Li, Dongxu Li, Jianwen Mo, Huibing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaoyu ShouSchool of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Yihong LiSchool of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Dongxu LiSchool of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.ORCID 0009-0007-8386-4136
Jianwen MoSchool of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Huibing ZhangSchool of Computer and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to accurately assess the students' learning process and the cognitive state of knowledge points in smart classroom. A classroom network structure learning engagement and parallel temporal attention LSTM based knowledge tracing model (CL-PTKT) is proposed in this paper. First, a classroom network is constructed based on the information of student ID, seating relationship, and head-up/head-down state obtained from the smart classroom video. Second, a learning engagement model is established by utilizing the head-up/head-down state of students and the structural characteristics of the classroom network. Finally, in this paper innovatively proposes a parallel temporal attention LSTM feature tracking algorithm based on the learning engagement model and the knowledge-exercise data. It can fully considers the potential associated attributes of the knowledge-knowledge, knowledge-exercise and knowledge-learning engagement. And accurately characterizes the knowledge state during the knowledge point's lecture time. To provide effective support for teachers to make seat adjustments and accurate interventions for in the teaching process. This paper conducts extensive experiments under four real datasets. The algorithm in this paper shows optimal performance in all four evaluation metrics compared to the state-of-the-art knowledge tracing models.

Indexed as

AttentionLearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansKnowledgeSchoolsStudents

Identifiers

PMID40193526
PMCPMC11975130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.