ArticlePloS one2025
Rumor detection on social networks based on Temporal Tree Transformer.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid propagation of rumors on social media can give rise to various social issues, underscoring the necessity of swift and automated rumor detection. Existing studies typically identify rumors based on their textual or static propagation structural information, without considering the dynamic changes in the structure of rumor propagation over time. In this paper, we propose the Temporal Tree Transformer model, which simultaneously considers text, propagation structure, and temporal changes. By analyzing observing the growth of propagation tree structures in different time windows, we use Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) to encode these trees to obtain better representations for the classification task. We evaluate our model's performance using the PHEME dataset. In most existing studies, information leakage occurs when conversation threads from all events are randomly divided into training and test sets. We perform Leave-One-Event-Out (LOEO) cross-validation, which better reflects real-world scenarios. The experimental results show that our model achieves state-of-the-art accuracy 75.84% and Macro F1 score of 71.98%, respectively. These results demonstrate that extracting temporal features from propagation structures leads to improved model generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.