Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193387›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Cross-device federated unsupervised learning for the detection of anomalies in single-lead electrocardiogram signals.

Maximilian Kapsecker, Stephan M Jonas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maximilian KapseckerTUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching bei München, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-0749
Stephan M JonasInstitute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFederated unsupervised learning offers a promising approach to leveraging decentralized data stored on consumer devices, addressing concerns about privacy and lack of annotation. Single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) captured on consumer devices are of particular interest due to the global prevalence of cardiovascular disease. The combination of federated and unsupervised learning on biomedical data in a cross-device environment raises questions regarding feasibility and accuracy, especially when considering heterogeneous data.

methodsA randomly selected subset of the Icentia11k open-source dataset containing mobile ECG recordings was used for this study. Heartbeats are labeled as normal, unknown or the pathological classes: premature atrial contraction and premature ventricular contraction. A linear autoencoder model was used as a method to predict the pathological cases using the embedding space and reconstruction error. The model was integrated into a mobile application that supports ECG data recording, preprocessing into heartbeat segments, and participation in a federated learning pipeline as a client node. The autoencoder was trained collaboratively using federated learning with twenty mobile devices, followed by an additional ten epochs of on-device fine-tuning to account for personalization.

resultsThe approach yielded a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.8 when the predicted anomalies were compared with the ground truth in a binary fashion. Specifically, the detection rate for premature ventricular contraction was excellent with a sensitivity of 0.97.

conclusionOverall, the approach proved to be feasible in implementation and competitive in accuracy, specifically when the model was fine-tuned to the subject's data.

Identifiers

PMID40193387
PMCPMC11975069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.