ArticlePloS one2025
Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening decisions among Saudi women: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upregulation of miR-32 in tissue and plasma and its association with PTEN expression in colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Investigating predictive factors of participation in colorectal cancer screening based on the Preventive Health Model (PHM) and health literacy.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Public knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cancer screening in the UAE: a comprehensive assessment to inform screening practices.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Barriers to colorectal cancer screening tests among adults in the Saudi population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- Determinants of Colorectal Cancer: Risk Factors, Knowledge, and Diagnosis in a Cross-Sectional Study of Saudi Adults.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health challenge and one of the most prevalent cancers in Saudi Arabia. Studies show that young Saudi women are often diagnosed with CRC at more advanced stages, leading to poorer prognoses. Despite the recent launch of the first Saudi national CRC screening program, public awareness and acceptance of CRC screening (CRCS) remain limited.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 women aged 40 or older to explore their awareness, views, and attitudes toward CRC and CRCS. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, and the Social Ecological Model was applied to guide the structuring and organization of the developed themes.
resultsWe identified a multifaceted interplay of knowledge, beliefs, and social-cultural factors influencing CRCS decisions among Saudi women. Although there was a general awareness of CRC, understanding of risk factors, signs, and symptoms was limited. Many participants adopted a reactive approach to screening, prompted by symptom manifestation or family history, rather than preventive health measures. Concerns such as fear of a cancer diagnosis and discomfort with the stool sample collection process hindered screening participation. Social support from family and community, and physician recommendations were crucial in encouraging screening uptake. Logistic and digital literacy challenges in accessing health services were noted for older adults. Participants stressed the need for increased CRC awareness, equitable access to screening services, and reminders to improve CRCS participation.
conclusionFactors influencing CRCS uptake among Saudi women are complex and multifaceted. Comprehensive and tailored health promotion interventions that meet community needs are essential. Further research is needed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in increasing screening uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.