Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193382›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening decisions among Saudi women: A qualitative study.

Norah Alsadhan, Cathy Brennan, Sultana A Alhurishi, Farag Shuweihdi, Robert M West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Norah AlsadhanLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2616-0659
Cathy BrennanPsychological & Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Sultana A AlhurishiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Farag ShuweihdiDental Translational & Clinical Research Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Robert M WestLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health challenge and one of the most prevalent cancers in Saudi Arabia. Studies show that young Saudi women are often diagnosed with CRC at more advanced stages, leading to poorer prognoses. Despite the recent launch of the first Saudi national CRC screening program, public awareness and acceptance of CRC screening (CRCS) remain limited.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 women aged 40 or older to explore their awareness, views, and attitudes toward CRC and CRCS. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, and the Social Ecological Model was applied to guide the structuring and organization of the developed themes.

resultsWe identified a multifaceted interplay of knowledge, beliefs, and social-cultural factors influencing CRCS decisions among Saudi women. Although there was a general awareness of CRC, understanding of risk factors, signs, and symptoms was limited. Many participants adopted a reactive approach to screening, prompted by symptom manifestation or family history, rather than preventive health measures. Concerns such as fear of a cancer diagnosis and discomfort with the stool sample collection process hindered screening participation. Social support from family and community, and physician recommendations were crucial in encouraging screening uptake. Logistic and digital literacy challenges in accessing health services were noted for older adults. Participants stressed the need for increased CRC awareness, equitable access to screening services, and reminders to improve CRCS participation.

conclusionFactors influencing CRCS uptake among Saudi women are complex and multifaceted. Comprehensive and tailored health promotion interventions that meet community needs are essential. Further research is needed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in increasing screening uptake.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID40193382
PMCPMC11975113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.