ArticlePloS one2025
Tensions regarding inclusion meanings from stakeholders' perspectives: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In literature, a divergence is apparent concerning the definition of educational inclusion. The study aims to describe the relationship between the diversity of actors in the university community and their perception of institutional inclusion in higher education organizations in Chile. We employed a qualitative methodology based on Grounded Theory, conducting focus groups with 16 students, 17 teachers, five non-teaching staff, and eight authorities. We conducted a semi-structured interview with an authority, encompassing all three university campuses in the country. The data analysis revealed five subcategories associated with the topic. What is understood by the concept of inclusion? What do they think about inclusion? Who should be the subjects of inclusion? What changes have been observed in inclusion? Moreover, why is it necessary to define inclusion? The emphasis is on the diverse existing views around the approach to the concept and the need to generate definitions with institutional relevance to advance its development and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.