Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193377›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Comparison between bupivacaine-lidocaine, dexamethasone mixture and bupivacaine alone for motor recovery after axillary brachial plexus block in distal radius surgery: A prospective randomized trial.

Rawee Jongkongkawutthi, Paweenus Rungwattanakit, Pathom Halilamien, Suppachai Poolsuppasit, Busara Sirivanasandha

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rawee JongkongkawutthiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Paweenus RungwattanakitDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pathom HalilamienDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suppachai PoolsuppasitDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Busara SirivanasandhaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8821-5043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged motor block, known as "dead arm," which can cause patient discomfort and anxiety, is a serious concern that is often overlooked in ambulatory surgery, particularly in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the recovery time of motor blockade with bupivacaine and a mixture of bupivacaine-lidocaine-dexamethasone in axillary brachial plexus block.

methodsA prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial was conducted with 70 patients scheduled for distal end radius fixation under axillary brachial plexus block. A local anesthetic mixture group (LA-mixture group) received a 21 ml mixture of 0.2% bupivacaine with 1.2% lidocaine and 5 mg of dexamethasone (n =  35). A bupivacaine group received 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1 ml of normal saline (n =  35). The primary outcome was the duration of the motor blockade. Secondary outcomes included the duration of sensory blockade, postoperative pain score, and the incidence of rebound pain.

resultsThe demographic data were similar between the two groups. The mean times for recovery of hand grips and sensation were 13.5 ±  7.3 and 12.6 ±  6.2 hours in the LA-mixture group and 15.3 ±  6.7 and 14.6 ±  6.2 hours in the bupivacaine group. Pain scores were not significantly different between the two groups, but the incidence of rebound pain was lower in the LA-mixture group (8.6% and 28.6%, p =  0.031).

conclusionThe bupivacaine-lidocaine, dexamethasone mixture failed to enhance motor recovery compared to 0.5% bupivacaine alone. However, patients in the mixture group appeared to experience a lower incidence of rebound pain.

trial registrationThai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20200114003.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalBrachial Plexus BlockBupivacaineDexamethasoneLidocaineAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineDexamethasoneLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID40193377
PMCPMC11975137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.