ArticlePLOS global public health2025
The determinants of female genital mutilation among daughters in Nigeria.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female Genital Mutilation/Circumcision (FGM/C) refers to the complete or incomplete removal of the female external genital or other injuries for non-medical or cultural reasons. It is a culturally harmful practice without health benefits with long-term complications to women's psychological, physical, and sexual health and well-being that violates the victims' rights because it is done without their consent. Despite International efforts to eradicate this harmful practice, it persists, therefore, this study examined the sociodemographic factors of mothers of reproductive age that affected the likelihood of their daughters undergoing female genital mutilation or circumcision. The 2021 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) female genital mutilation response weighted data of women of reproductive age 15-49 years was used for this study. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done to predict the determinants of female genital mutilation among daughters, and those with a p-value of ≤.05 were considered statistically significant determinants. Results showed a statistically significant difference between educational level, ethnicity of household head, household wealth index, geopolitical zone, ever circumcised, and daughter circumcised at Alpha =.05 in the multivariable regression analysis. Place of Residence and Marital Status were not statistically significant in the multivariable regression analysis at Alpha =.05. Considering that Nigeria has a population of over 200 million people, a figure of 14.2% of daughters circumcised is high and, therefore, requires concerted interventions by all stakeholders to address this harmful practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.