ArticlePloS one2025
Patients' experiences of a Virtual Fracture Assessment Clinic Pathway: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesExisting literature has demonstrated the efficacy of a virtual fracture assessment clinic pathway, however there is limited research exploring patients' experiences of a complete pathway, from initial presentation at the Emergency Department or Injury Unit to discharge. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of patients who have recently sustained a stable peripheral limb fracture, having received care across a complete virtual fracture assessment clinic pathway, in order to improve patient care.
methodsOne-to-one semi-structured interviews were completed via recorded phone and video calls, with a purposive sample of 12 participants. Interviews were completed until data saturation was achieved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data was analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsSix overarching themes were identified; 'trust' (in the pathway and management plan), 'conflicting advice' (on diagnosis and management plan), 'information' (need for more basic information), 'severity of injury' (participants' perceptions of the severity of their injuries), 'reassurance' (through follow-up x-rays and physiotherapy consultations) and 'efficiency'.
conclusionsThis is the first qualitative study exploring patients' experiences of a complete virtual fracture assessment clinic pathway. Patients' experiences may be improved through patient education on the pathway process and providing standardised injury-specific patient information documentation. Regular communication between different healthcare professionals involved in the pathway may reduce conflicting advice. Developing an opt-in physiotherapy service and providing patients with a standardised text message informing patients when their virtual consultation will occur may also improve patients' experience of the pathway. Establishing a referral pathway with a fracture liaison service is also recommended to further enhance a virtual fracture assessment clinic pathway. Future research is needed to investigate how therapeutic relationships can be developed when care is delivered virtually and to explore the experiences of patient cohorts who were not included in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.