ArticlePloS one2025
Objective demonstration and quantitation of musical learning in older adult novices across a 12-month online study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aimed to objectively (mainly computationally) measure the extent to which 68 older adult novices developed specific musical abilities. The participants learned aural and keyboard performance skills in a 12-month online course with an expert piano teacher, spending six months each on a digital piano keyboard and an iPad virtual piano. Within each 6 months, 3 were devoted successively to each of melodic replication and improvisation. Teaching sought correctness of pitches/sequences (for replication), and introduction of systematic diversity thereof (for improvisation). We measured aural perception using melody detection and beat alignment tests; and replication and improvisation learning using computational measures of MIDI-recordings. Bayesian modelling showed that melody detection, replication and improvisation were learned successfully and seemingly progressively, while beat detection, and rhythmic precision in replication, which were not our focus, were not. These skills were retained over a 6-month follow-up period. Improvisation teaching was the bigger predictor of melody detection, and replication teaching of replication performance. Potential applications for these findings in learning contexts are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.