ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing microbial diversity in open-pit mining: Metabarcoding analysis of soil and pit microbiota across operational and restoration stages.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mine closure operations aim to restore the ecosystem to a near-original state. Microorganisms are indispensable for soil equilibrium and restoration. Metabarcoding was employed to characterize the bacterial and fungal composition in pristine soils, stockpiled soils (topsoils), enriched stockpiled soils (technosoils), enriched and revegetated soils (revegetated technosoils), and pit ecosystems in an open pit gold mine. Chao1 analysis revealed highest richness in pristine and topsoils, followed by technosoils (-17.5%) and pits (-63%). Bacterial diversity surpassed fungal diversity (-40%) in soil samples, but fungal OTUs were more abundant in pit samples (+73.4%). The findings identified the dominant microbial communities and conducted a comparative analysis of the shared microbiota. Dominant genera differed notably between pristine, topsoil, and technosoil samples for bacteria and fungi. The ecological indices' results indicated that the pristine soil microbial communities were distinct from those in the topsoils, revealing significant alterations during the stockpiling process. The revegetated technosoil showed more similarity to the pristine and topsoil samples than to the freshly prepared technosoil, suggesting that microbial restoration is an ongoing phenomenon. Microbial restoration analysis revealed that Bacterial communities recover faster than fungal communities highlighting the potential of managing technosoil physicochemical parameters to enhance microbial recovery similar to those found in pristine soils. Runoff water contribute to this rebalancing by transporting microorganisms between ecosystem. All pit samples exhibited significant differences in their microbial composition, with moisture and rock composition representing the primary axes of dissimilarity. The greater community complexity observed in soils is related to the availability of nutrients, physicochemical variations, and the possibility of interaction with other microbes. Pits represent extreme ecosystems that limit the growth of most microorganisms. The presented research provides a scientific basis for future restoration strategies to improve microbial diversity and ecosystem resilience in altered landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.