ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: A study on efficacy and safety.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Clinical research advances in thoracic surgery and thoracic oncology in 2025: a panoramic narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of immunosuppressants and chemotherapy has reshaped the treatment landscape for esophageal cancer (EC). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) regimen in patients with resectable EC. A total of 99 eligible patients were included. Data on patient characteristics, nICT regimens, surgical approaches, postoperative outcomes, adverse events (AEs) related to neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were collected. OS, DFS, and safety were the primary endpoints. Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors in the overall population. Additionally, exploratory research was conducted to assess the clinical value of blood immune indicators in predicting tumor regression. Following surgery, 99.0% of patients achieved complete resection (R0). After neoadjuvant therapy, the number of patients with stage T0N0 increased, with complete or moderate responses being the most common outcomes according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/ College of American Pathologists (CAP)-tumor regression grading (TRG) evaluations (64.7%). The one-year OS and DFS rates were 91.6% and 49.3%, respectively. Grade ≥3 AEs related to neoadjuvant therapy occurred in 21.2% of patients, with gastrointestinal reactions being the most frequent (16 cases, 16.2%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Grade ≥3 surgery-related AEs occurred in 10.1% of patients, with anastomotic leakage being the most common (six cases, 6.1%). Several factors were associated with significantly improved OS, including chemotherapy regimens combining paclitaxel with platinum, surgical approaches using laparoscopy or thoracotomy (left or right), an interval of ≤34 days between the last treatment and surgery, and the absence of positive lymph node detection. Higher cT staging was significantly associated with worse DFS. Blood immune markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were found to predict tumor regression in EC patients. In summary, nICT demonstrated favorable effectiveness and safety in resectable EC. The choice of platinum-based chemotherapy agents, rather than the type of immunosuppressant, was associated with prognosis. Moreover, a shorter interval (≤34 days) between the final nICT administration and surgery was linked to improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.