ArticleJournal of glaucoma2025
Gap Analysis of Standard Automated Perimetry Concept Representation in Medical Terminologies.
Article in Journal of glaucoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PRÉCIS: In this multi-institutional effort, we identified gaps in SAP data elements within medical terminologies. We proposed new concepts to LOINC to enhance SAP data standards and big data representation and improve interoperability across health care systems. PURPOSE: To identify gaps in the representation of Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) data elements in Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) and the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) and propose solutions for those gaps.
methodsSAP source data elements and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard from 2 commonly used perimeter devices were extracted and compared against existing concepts in standardized terminologies using the OMOP CDM Athena browser and LOINC using the LOINC browser. Gap areas were identified and classified following conventions used by Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources and discussed within the OHDSI Eye Care and Vision Research Workgroup in iterative rounds aiming to address gaps. New codes were developed upon reaching a consensus and proposed for inclusion in LOINC.
resultsAmong 107 data elements extracted from the perimeters, 82% (n=88) of SAP data elements lacked representation. Of the 19 remaining elements, 2.8% (n=3) were wider, 1.9% (n=2) were narrower, and 13% (n=14) had equivalent representation. In addition, only 2.6% (n=3) of the 116 DICOM attributes related to SAP had representation in standardized terminologies. Several existing relevant codes were defined ambiguously or erroneously (eg, visual field index, pupil diameter, perimeter format Kowa).
conclusionThere is a lack of representation of some SAP data elements in standardized medical terminologies, hampering interoperability and data sharing. We identified gaps and proposed new concepts for addition to LOINC, aiming to improve SAP data standards and interoperability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.