Trial reportCancer2025
Cladribine, idarubicin, and cytarabine (CLIA) for patients with relapsed and/or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
Trial report in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02115295 (Phase II Study of Cladribine Plus Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Study of Cladribine Plus Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine (ARAC) in Patients With AML, HR MDS, or Myeloid Blast Phase of CML
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute myeloid leukemia with plasmacytoid dendritic cell proliferation: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains challenging because of poor responses to chemotherapy. Efforts to improve outcomes have included the use of high-dose cytarabine in combination with nucleoside analogs, such as cladribine. The authors evaluated combined cladribine, idarubicin, and cytarabine (CLIA) in a phase 2 trial of 66 patients with R/R AML.
methodsPatients received induction with cladribine 5 mg/m
resultsThe composite response rate (complete remission [CR] plus complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) was 33%; salvage 1 (S1) patients (n = 35) had a CR/CRi rate of 49%. After a 61-month median follow-up, the median overall survival (OS) was 7.9 months, with a median relapse-free survival (RFS) of 9.1 months for those in CR/CRi. The median OS for S1 patients was 12 months, with a median RFS of 10.3 months. For those who received CLIA with sorafenib (n = 22), the CR/CRi rate was 41%, median OS was 8.8 months, and median RFS was 3.8 months. Landmark analysis demonstrated superior OS for patients who proceeded to transplantation compared with patients who did not (median OS, 78 vs. 8.8 months, respectively; p < .001). The 4-week and 8-week mortality rates were 6% and 17%, respectively. Most grade >3 adverse events were related to infection and elevated liver function tests.
conclusionsCLIA is effective for patients with R/R AML and offers a safety profile similar to that of other intensive regimens (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02115295).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.