ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Assessing Patient-Reported Satisfaction With Care and Documentation Time in Primary Care Through AI-Driven Automatic Clinical Note Generation: Protocol for a Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06618092 (Relisten), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Relisten: Improvement in Perceived Quality of Care and Time Savings in Writing Tasks Through the Automatic Generation of Clinical Notes in Primary Care: a Proof of Concept.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelisten is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software developed by Recog Analytics that improves patient care by facilitating more natural interactions between health care professionals and patients. This tool extracts relevant information from recorded conversations, structuring it in the medical record, and sending it to the Health Information System after the professional's approval. This approach allows professionals to focus on the patient without the need to perform clinical documentation tasks.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate patient-reported satisfaction and perceived quality of care, assess health care professionals' satisfaction with the care provided, and measure the time spent on entering records into the electronic medical record using this AI-powered solution.
methodsThis proof-of-concept (PoC) study is conducted as a multicenter trial with the participation of several health care professionals (nurses and physicians) in primary care centers (CAPs). The key outcome measures include (1) patient-reported quality of care (evaluated through anonymous surveys), (2) health care professionals' satisfaction with the care provided (assessed through surveys and structured interviews), and (3) time saved on clinical documentation (determined by comparing the time spent manually writing notes versus reviewing and correcting AI-generated notes). Statistical analyses will be performed for each objective, using independent sample comparison tests according to normality evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Lilliefors correction. Stratified statistical tests will also be performed to consider the variance between professionals.
resultsThe protocol has been developed using the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) checklist. Recruitment began in July 2024, and as of November 2024, a total of 318 patients have been enrolled. Recruitment is expected to be completed by March 2025. Data analysis will take place between April and May 2025, with results expected to be published in June 2025.
conclusionsWe expect an improvement in the perceived quality of care reported by patients and a significant reduction in the time spent taking clinical notes, with a saving of at least 30 seconds per visit. Although a high quality of the notes generated is expected, it is uncertain whether a significant improvement over the control group, which is already expected to have high-quality notes, will be demonstrated.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06618092; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06618092. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/66232.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.