Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193150›Full record

ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Navigating Power Imbalances and Stigma in Mental Healthcare. Patient-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Care, a Qualitative Meta-Summary.

Lien Mertens, Joris Vandenberghe, Geertruida Bekkering, Karin Hannes, Nicolas Delvaux, Pieter Van Bostraeten, Jasmien Jaeken, Bert Aertgeerts, Mieke Vermandere

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Responsible artificial intelligence integration framework for psychiatric guidelines.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lien MertensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0638-8248
Joris VandenberghePsychiatry Research Group, Department of Neurosciences KU Leuven, UPC KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geertruida BekkeringDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Karin HannesResearch Group SoMeTHin'K, Faculty of Social Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nicolas DelvauxBelgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Leuven, Belgium.
Pieter Van BostraetenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jasmien JaekenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bert AertgeertsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mieke VermandereDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

This study received a grant from the 'Constant Van de Wiel-Joanna Mathues Fund' of the Faculty of Medicine of the Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Belgium.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of shared decision-making (SDM) in mental healthcare has been viewed as at least as important as its use in non-mental healthcare settings, but it still does not routinely take place in this setting. To further explore SDM processes with people with lived experience, we provide a qualitative meta-summary on patient-reported barriers and facilitators to participation in SDM within the context of mental healthcare.

methodsWithin the set of selected studies for a larger qualitative meta-summary, using five databases, we selected the studies that had surveyed patients with mental illness for further analysis in this paper. Search terms were based on the concepts: 'decision making', 'patient participation', 'patient perceptions' and 'study design' of patient reporting, including patient surveys, interviews and focus groups.

resultsOut of the 90 studies that had been selected for the larger review, we selected 13 articles concerning mental illness for more detailed analysis in this review. In total, we identified 29 different influencing factors and we found 6 major barriers: 'Lack of choice', 'Not being respected as a person', 'Feeling stigma from physician', 'Disease burden', 'Power imbalance' and 'Low self-efficacy to participate'. 'Clear information provision about options', 'Being respected as a person, being taken into account', 'Good physician-patient relationship' and 'Belief in the importance of one's own role' were the main facilitators.

conclusionsStigma and self-stigma still seem to persist in mental healthcare and continue to suppress patients' self-efficacy to participate in SDM in this setting. There is much discussion of inclusion and diversity worldwide, and these themes are just as topical for patients with mental health problems. Further work seems necessary to eradicate all stigma and self-stigma in this setting when striving for care that could be 'as shared as possible'. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The authors wish to thank Mr. Walter Geuens, a person with lived experience in mental healthcare, for his careful reading and thorough feedback on the final paper.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPatient ParticipationPower, PsychologicalSocial StigmaHumansQualitative Researchbarriers and facilitatorsmental healthcarepatient participationpatient perspectivepatient‐reportedshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID40193150
PMCPMC11974453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.