Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193148›Full record

Trial reportOrganogenesis2025

Optimized Individualized Nursing Improves Recovery and Reduces Complications in ICU Patients with Severe Pneumonia.

Linjuan Wu, Jingchuan Lin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Organogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linjuan WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jingchuan LinDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluates the effectiveness of optimized individualized nursing interventions on clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with severe pneumonia.

methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 76 patients with severe pneumonia were randomized into a control group and an experimental group. Both groups received routine nursing care. On this basis, the experimental group received optimized individualized nursing. After the nursing intervention, clinical outcomes, respiratory function, coagulation function, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and St. George's Respiratory Problems Questionnaire (SGRQ) score were assessed, and the complication and mortality rates were counted.

resultsAfter the intervention, compared with the control group, the experimental group exhibited shorter times of fever reduction, white blood cell count recovery, and off-boarding and ICU stay, higher oxygenation index, lower rapid shallow breathing index, respiratory rate, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and D-Dimer levels, lower APACHE II scores and SGRQ scores (

conclusionImplementing optimized individualized nursing can significantly enhance recovery and reduce complications in ICU patients with severe pneumonia.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPneumoniaAgedAPACHEFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeApplication effectcoagulation functionintensive care unitoptimized individualized nursingrespiratory functionsevere pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID40193148
PMCPMC11980446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.