Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193128›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation: Mapping Non-Motor Outcomes to Structural Connections.

Garance M Meyer, Ilkem Aysu Sahin, Barbara Hollunder, Konstantin Butenko, Nanditha Rajamani, Clemens Neudorfer, Lauren A Hart, Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer, Haidar S Dafsari, Michael T Barbe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Garance M MeyerCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3350-6070
Ilkem Aysu SahinMovement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Barbara HollunderMovement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0104-6927
Konstantin ButenkoCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nanditha RajamaniCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clemens NeudorferCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lauren A HartCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jan Niklas Petry-SchmelzerDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Haidar S DafsariDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8849-4233
Michael T BarbeDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Veerle Visser-VandewalleDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Philip E MosleyClinical Brain Networks Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-3419
Andreas HornCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

BRAIN CONNECTS: The center for Large-scale Imaging of Neural Circuits (LINC)UM1NS132358 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Suzanne N Haber, Elizabeth M. C. Hillman · 2023 to 2026
$17.5M
Using human brain connectivity to identify the causal neuroanatomical substrate of depression symptomsR01MH113929 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MICHAEL D FOX · 2017 to 2026
$6.9M
Using Brain Lesions and Deep Brain Stimulation to Identify an Epilepsy CircuitR01NS127892 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MICHAEL D FOX · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 424778381-TRR 295Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtNew Venture FundNIH HHS 1R01NS127892-01NIH HHS 2R01 MH113929NIH HHS R01 13478451NIH HHS UM1NS132358NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113929NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS127892NINDS NIH HHS UM1 NS132358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Parkinson's Disease (PD), deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) reliably improves motor symptoms, and the circuits mediating these effects have largely been identified. However, non-motor outcomes are more variable, and it remains unclear which specific brain circuits need to be modulated or avoided to improve them. Since numerous non-motor symptoms potentially respond to DBS, it is challenging to independently identify the circuits mediating each one of them. Data compression algorithms such as principal component analysis (PCA) may provide a powerful alternative. This study aimed at providing a proof of concept for this approach by mapping changes along extensive score batteries to a few anatomical fiber bundles and, in turn, estimating changes in individual scores based on stimulation of these tracts. Retrospective data from 56 patients with PD and bilateral STN-DBS was included. The patients had undergone comprehensive clinical assessments covering changes in appetitive behaviors, mood, anxiety, impulsivity, cognition, and empathy. PCA was implemented to identify the main dimensions of neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological outcomes. Using DBS fiber filtering, we identified the structural connections whose stimulation was associated with change along these dimensions. Then, estimates of individual symptom outcomes were derived based on the stimulation of these connections by inverting the PCA. Finally, changes along a specific non-motor score were estimated in an independent validation dataset (N = 68) using the tract model. Four principal components were retained, which could be interpreted to reflect (i) general non-motor improvement; (ii) improvement of mood and cognition and worsening of trait impulsivity; (iii) improvement of cognition; and (iv) improvement of empathy and worsening of impulsive-compulsive behaviors. Each component was associated with the stimulation of spatially segregated fiber bundles connecting regions of the frontal cortex with the subthalamic nucleus. The extent of stimulation of these tracts was able to explain significant amounts of variance in outcomes for individual symptoms in the original cohort (circular analysis), as well as in the rank of depression outcomes in the independent validation cohort. Our approach represents an innovative concept for mapping changes along extensive score batteries to a few anatomical fiber bundles and could pave the way toward personalized deep brain stimulation.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationParkinson DiseaseSubthalamic NucleusAgedDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisRetrospective Studiesdeep brain stimulationnon‐motor symptomsParkinson's diseasestructural connectivitysubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID40193128
PMCPMC11974458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.