Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193036›Full record

Trial reportProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026

Assessing the Efficacy of Ligilactobacillus salivarius CLS0420 and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei CLPC0603 on Vaginal Well-Being in Healthy Women: A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Se-Young Kim, Donghyeok Seol, Misun Jeong, Woori Kwak, Heebal Kim, Seoae Cho, Tae-Hyun Kim

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Se-Young Kim *Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6886-4890
Donghyeok Seol *Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9695-5861
Misun JeongeGnome, Inc., 304 Bongeunsa-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06143, Republic of Korea.
Woori KwakDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea, 43 Jibong-Ro, Wonmi-Gu, Bucheon, 14662, Republic of Korea.
Heebal KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3064-1303
Seoae ChoeGnome, Inc., 304 Bongeunsa-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06143, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Hyun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, 158 Gwanjeodong-Ro, Seo-Gu, Daejeon, 35365, Republic of Korea. th2580@kyuh.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-0664-4854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing development of probiotics for preventing bacterial vaginosis (BV), their effectiveness in women without BV has not been thoroughly investigated. This pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess the impact of orally administered probiotic strains, exhibiting in vitro antimicrobial activity against Gardnerella vaginalis and Candida albicans, on vaginal well-being in women without preexisting health conditions. Healthy women (n = 30, aged 19-50) were enrolled and randomly assigned using simple randomization to receive either probiotic or placebo capsules. After excluding dropouts, 26 participants (15 in the probiotic group, 11 in the placebo group) completed the study, undergoing a 3-week intervention. Vaginal well-being was assessed before and after the intervention using self-assessed health on a 5-point Likert scale, along with analysis of the vaginal microbiome by targeting the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon region with the Nanopore sequencing platform and MIrROR database. Notably, only the probiotic group exhibited a significant improvement in self-assessed overall gut and vaginal health following the intervention (p = 0.009 and p = 0.003, respectively). Nevertheless, no significant changes were observed in the vaginal bacterial community following the intervention and confirming the vaginal colonization of orally ingested probiotic strains through metagenome sequencing proved challenging. In summary, these findings suggest that while oral probiotics may improve perceived vaginal well-being, their role in modulating the vaginal microbiome in healthy women remains inconclusive. Additional research with a larger sample size is necessary to substantiate the endorsement of oral probiotic consumption for preventing BV or maintaining vaginal health in healthy women. This study was retrospectively registered at Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) (KCT0008957, November 15, 2023).

Indexed as

Lacticaseibacillus paracaseiProbioticsVaginaVaginosis, BacterialAdultCandida albicansDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGardnerella vaginalisHumansMicrobiotaMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsYoung Adult16S-ITS-23S rRNA operonOxford Nanopore TechnologiesProbioticsVaginal microbiome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.