ReviewIndian pediatrics2025
Neurostimulation in Childhood Epilepsy.
Review in Indian pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: mechanisms, applications, and research progress.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common and debilitating neurological disorder in children, and approximately a third of them have ongoing seizures despite adequate trial of antiseizure medications. Neurostimulation approaches may be an option for those with drug resistant epilepsy. Several invasive and non-invasive devices have been trialled and found to be effective in reducing seizure burden in drug resistant epilepsy. These techniques appear to be safe and well tolerated. We review the available evidence for the use of these devices, including vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. The results of trials are promising but there are fewer studies in children. Apart from vagus nerve stimulation, none of the other neurostimulation techniques are currently approved for use in children and their use is off-label or in clinical trials. Further well-designed trials are needed, especially in children, to identify the most effective neurostimulation options and optimal parameters for improvement of seizure burden and quality of life. Neurostimulation techniques are also being trialled for treatment of refractory status epilepticus, but lack of robust evidence (mainly case studies or case series reports) makes it difficult to predict therapeutic benefit at present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.