Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40193034›Full record

ReviewIndian pediatrics2025

Neurostimulation in Childhood Epilepsy.

Soumya Ghosh, Lakshmi Nagarajan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soumya GhoshChildren's Neuroscience Service, Dept of Neurology, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia. Soumya.Ghosh@health.wa.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8508-0641
Lakshmi NagarajanChildren's Neuroscience Service, Dept of Neurology, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.

Funding

Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation Equipment grant for Neurostimulation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is a common and debilitating neurological disorder in children, and approximately a third of them have ongoing seizures despite adequate trial of antiseizure medications. Neurostimulation approaches may be an option for those with drug resistant epilepsy. Several invasive and non-invasive devices have been trialled and found to be effective in reducing seizure burden in drug resistant epilepsy. These techniques appear to be safe and well tolerated. We review the available evidence for the use of these devices, including vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. The results of trials are promising but there are fewer studies in children. Apart from vagus nerve stimulation, none of the other neurostimulation techniques are currently approved for use in children and their use is off-label or in clinical trials. Further well-designed trials are needed, especially in children, to identify the most effective neurostimulation options and optimal parameters for improvement of seizure burden and quality of life. Neurostimulation techniques are also being trialled for treatment of refractory status epilepticus, but lack of robust evidence (mainly case studies or case series reports) makes it difficult to predict therapeutic benefit at present.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyEpilepsyChildDeep Brain StimulationHumansTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationDeep brain stimulationDrug resistant epilepsyNon-invasive brain stimulationResponsive neurostimulationVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40193034
PMCPMC12041114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.