ArticleHelicobacter
Real-Time PCR Helicobacter pylori Test in Comparison With Culture and Histology for Helicobacter pylori Detection and Identification of Resistance to Clarithromycin: A Single-Center Real-Life Study.
Article in Helicobacter. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resistance to Clarithromycin and Fluoroquinolones inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn our center, RT-PCR was integrated as a routine method to diagnose Helicobacter pylori due to its higher availability after COVID-19 pandemics. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and performance of systematically performed RT-PCR for H. pylori detection and clarithromycin (CLA) resistance in a real-life clinical practice. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred consecutive patients underwent an upper digestive endoscopy during which at least four biopsies (two from the antrum and two from the corpus) were obtained for RT-PCR and culture with antibiogram and four additional biopsies for histology. The results of H. pylori detection were compared among RT-PCR, histology, and bacterial culture, and the results of CLA susceptibility were compared between culture-based antibiogram and RT-PCR.
resultsOut of 100 patients, 64 were positive for H. pylori by RT-PCR, 66 by histology, and 53 by culture, with no statistically significant difference among the three methods (p > 0.05). CLA resistance was found in 8 out of 45 patients (17.7%) by culture and in 12 out of 64 patients (18.7%) by PCR. In 8 H. pylori-positive patients by culture, the antibiogram could not be realized due to lack of viability of the strains. In one patient, after a double checking, discrepant results were observed, requiring a complementary molecular analysis by the French National Reference Center for Helicobacters, which confirmed the existence of a double population of H. pylori strains within biopsies, with and without CLA resistance.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that in real-life clinical practice, RT-PCR is feasible and comparable in the ability to detect H. pylori and its resistance to CLA to bacterial culture with antibiogram and histology. Given its rapidity and limited dependence on the operator's interpretation, it appears preferable to the other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.