ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2025
Role of
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- SNMMI/EANM/ACNM Procedure Standard/Procedure Guideline on the Use of Molecular Imaging for Renal Mass Characterization.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Guideline
- CAIX-targeted PET/CT in the evaluation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a head-to-head comparison with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Trial
- Percutaneous thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future directions.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Imaging response assessment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a radiologist's guide to contemporary therapeutic strategies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Radiopharmaceuticals in Renal Imaging: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications and Future Prospects.ACS omega · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the imaging characteristics of various renal cell tumors using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), based on the latest WHO-2022 classification. Due to the physiological accumulation of FDG in the kidneys, the clinical utility of FDG-PET in the evaluation of renal tumors has traditionally been considered limited. However, recent studies have re-evaluated its potential value. FDG-PET has demonstrated particular utility in detecting metastases and postoperative recurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as well as in identifying RCC in patients with chronic kidney failure, where FDG excretion into the urinary tract is reduced. Renal tumors are occasionally detected incidentally on FDG-PET, and FDG uptake varies depending on the tumor subtype. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of these imaging characteristics is clinically important, as it may serve as a valuable guide for subsequent diagnostic evaluations. Furthermore, recent advancements in the development of novel PET tracers hold promise for future applications in the imaging of renal tumors. We believe that the insights gained from this study will contribute to routine diagnostic practice and the planning of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.