Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192982›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

Therapeutic Challenges in the Management of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Carcinoma (SEIC).

Emily Hicks, Akash Shah, Robert V Higgins

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily Hicks *Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Akash Shah *Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. akshah@augusta.edu.
Robert V HigginsMedical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementSerous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is an aggressive precursor and a similar biology to uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Patients diagnosed with SEIC should undergo surgical staging that includes total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, lymph node sampling, and omentectomy. With trends in lymph node evaluation shifting towards sentinel lymph node sampling, we recommend bilateral sentinel lymph node sampling as a reasonable alternative to full pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. There is limited data to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, however, it is apparent that those with extrauterine disease have a higher likelihood of recurrence and decreased overall survival. Those with stage IVB SEIC have similar rates of survival to those with stage IVB USC and may be a population that could benefit from newer regimens for advanced stage endometrial cancer including immunotherapy and maintenance therapy. Unfortunately, strong data to support this will continue to be a challenge given the rare incidence of isolated SEIC without concurrent USC. The utility of adjuvant radiotherapy remains unclear and given its noninvasive nature and propensity for distant recurrence, may be of little utility. Regardless of the adjuvant therapies selected, routine surveillance like that of USC should be followed as recurrences are often noted greater than one year after initial surgery. Unlike other precursor lesions, SEIC behaves similarly to invasive carcinoma and ultimately should be treated as such for optimal disease control and outcomes.

Indexed as

Carcinoma in SituCystadenocarcinoma, SerousEndometrial NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementFemaleHumansHysterectomyNeoplasm StagingTreatment OutcomeEndometrial cancerPrecursor lesionsSerous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.