Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192945›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2025

Melanoma skin cancer statistics derived from 7442 Japanese patients: Japanese melanoma study.

Yasuhiro Fujisawa, Shusuke Yoshikawa, Tatsuya Takenouchi, Shoichiro Mori, Jun Asai, Hisashi Uhara, Yuki Ichigosaki, Taku Fujimura, Yoshiyuki Nakamura, Yasuhiro Nakamura and 18 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current Surgical Management for Acral Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025
    Review
  5. Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review and Clinical Experience.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Yasuhiro FujisawaDepartment of Dermatology, Ehime University, 454 Shizugawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0204, Japan. fujisawa.yasuhiro.fp@ehime-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3010-8496
Shusuke YoshikawaDepartment of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan.
Tatsuya TakenouchiDivision of Dermatology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Shoichiro MoriDepartment of Dermatology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Jun AsaiDepartment of Dermatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan.
Hisashi UharaDepartment of Dermatology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yuki IchigosakiDepartment of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Taku FujimuraDepartment of Dermatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshiyuki NakamuraDepartment of Dermatology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yasuhiro NakamuraDepartment of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Fumitaka OhnoDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takeshi FukumotoDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Toshiyuki OzawaPharmaco-Physiology & Kinetics Collaborative Research Division, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Kenjiro NamikawaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru SugiharaDepartment of Dermatology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Toshihiko HoashiDepartment of Dermatology, Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo, Japan.
Takatoshi ShimauchiDepartment of Dermatology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yu SawadaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Hakata, Japan.
Hiroaki IwataDepartment of Dermatology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Taku MaedaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Takuya MiyagawaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitsugu ShibayamaDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Naohito HattaDepartment of Dermatology, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Akiko KishiDepartment of Dermatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi IshikawaDepartment of Dermatology, Saitama Cancer Center Hospital, Ina, Japan.
Hisao KawahiraDepartment of Dermatology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Norito KatohDepartment of Dermatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryuhei OkuyamaDepartment of Dermatology, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant melanoma (MM) is a rare but aggressive cutaneous cancer, accounting for only 2% of skin cancers in Japan but nearly half of skin cancer-related deaths. While the global incidence of MM is rising, its epidemiology varies significantly by ethnicity and geographic region. In Japan, melanoma incidence remains lower than in Western countries, with acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) being the most prevalent subtype. However, comprehensive epidemiological and clinical data remain limited.

methodsWe analyzed data from 7442 Japanese melanoma patients collected between 2005 and 2022 through the Japanese Melanoma Study (JMS). Demographic, clinical, and survival data were evaluated, including subtype distribution, TNM staging, and treatment outcomes.

resultsALM was the most common subtype (40.8%), followed by superficial spreading melanoma (20.2%). Lymph node metastasis was observed in 28.6% of cases, and distant metastasis in 10.9%. The BRAF mutation rate was 27.2%, with significantly lower frequencies in ALM (8.5%) and mucosal melanoma (4.8%). Among Stage IV patients, those treated with both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and BRAF(+ MEK) inhibitors demonstrated significantly improved survival compared to chemotherapy alone (P < 0.05). Adjuvant BRAF(+ MEK) inhibitor therapy also resulted in superior relapse-free survival compared to those who did not receive adjuvant therapy (P < 0.005).

conclusionThis study provides the largest dataset of Japanese melanoma patients to date, highlighting distinct epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Given their lower BRAF mutation rates and the limited efficacy of current ICI treatments, these findings emphasize the urgent need for optimize immunotherapy strategies in Japanese melanoma patients.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCutaneous Malignant MelanomaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIncidenceJapanMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm StagingBRAF protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafClinical subtypeMalignant melanomaStatisticsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID40192945
PMCPMC12174235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.