ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2025
Ex vivo comparison of drilling techniques for optimizing primary stability of zirconia dental implants in different bone densities.
Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was to investigate the primary stability of zirconia implants using varying drilling protocols, with a focus on the impact of thread cutting on insertion torque in both mixed (D2/D3) and soft (D4) bone types. The study aimed to evaluate whether reducing thread cutting could increase insertion torque and consequently improve primary stability.
methodsFour drilling protocols were developed, each varying in the degree of thread cutting: no thread cut, one-third thread cut, two-thirds thread cut, and full thread cut. Implants were placed into fresh porcine hip and tibia bones simulating D2/D3 and D4 bone. The protocols followed each implant system's manufacturer recommendations. Insertion torque was measured using a torque indicator, and statistical analysis was conducted with the Mann-Whitney U test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsSignificant differences in primary stability were observed between implant systems and drilling protocols, particularly in D4 bone. Three of the four implant systems showed improved primary stability in D4 bone when the thread cut was reduced (p < 0.05). One system achieved the recommended insertion torque with a full thread cut. In contrast, in D2/D3 bone, all implant systems required a full thread cut to remain within the manufacturer's torque guidelines.
conclusionsZirconia implant systems exhibit substantial variability in primary stability based on the selected drilling protocol and bone quality. Reducing thread cutting demonstrated improved stability in soft bone. However, excessive torque should be avoided to prevent mechanical failure, especially in systems with lower fracture resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.