ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2025
Managing Chronic Urticaria in Children: An Update.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical phenotypes and molecular endotypes of chronic urticaria: Linking clinical expression to underlying immune mechanisms.Asia Pacific allergy · 2026Review
- Dual dimensions of sensitization: age-stratified and disease-associated sIgE profiles in pediatric eczema and urticaria.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Comorbid Autoimmune Disorders in Children with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo provide an update and new insights into the management of pediatric patients with chronic urticaria. RECENT
findingsChronic urticaria in children may be more prevalent than previously thought, with a high resolution rate within two years. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are effective tools for assessing disease severity and control in pediatric populations. Children with chronic urticaria generally respond better to H1-antihistamines compared to adults. For patients refractory to antihistamines, omalizumab has shown excellent efficacy. Additionally, dupilumab has emerged as a potential treatment option, as it has been approved for chronic spontaneous urticaria in some countries. Managing chronic urticaria in children remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. However, advancements in understanding disease mechanisms, the validation of tools to assess disease activity and control, the development of reliable biomarkers, and the availability of novel therapies offer significant promise. These developments will enable more effective treatment and improved outcomes for pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40192928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.