Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192917›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

Disclosure Impact of Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace: A Scoping Review and a Thematic Analysis.

Cyrielle Richard, Marc Corbière, Hubert Fiset-Renaud, Meryl Caiada, Justin Lamontagne, Felix Diotte, Anne-Marie Kik, Raphaëlle Merlo, Tania Lecomte

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cyrielle RichardClinique d'Anxiété de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. richardjeromecyrielle@gmail.com.
Marc CorbièreDepartment of Education and Pedagogy, Career Counselling, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada. corbiere.marc@uqam.ca.
Hubert Fiset-RenaudDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Meryl CaiadaResearch Centre of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Justin LamontagneDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Felix DiotteDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Anne-Marie KikDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Raphaëlle MerloDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Tania LecomteResearch Centre of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDisclosing one's mental health conditions in the workplace is essential for accessing accommodations, but it can also bring negative consequences. This scoping review aims at collecting positive and negative impacts of disclosing mental health conditions in the workplace, with the hope of better supporting employees and organizations facing mental health disclosure at work.

methodWe conducted a synthesis of studies published between March 2000 and February 2025. Selected articles needed to address disclosure and mental health conditions in the workplace, from the perspective of employees, managers or organizations. Study biases were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Comparison. Articles were reviewed following principles of thematic analysis.

resultsThe 71 included studies reflect the range of impacts of mental health conditions disclosure. In total, 5 overarching themes and 12 themes were generated for the positive outcomes, whereas 6 overarching themes and 19 themes were identified for the negative outcomes. Those themes reflected both individual and organizational perspectives. Positive responses include receiving accommodations, advocacy engagement, improvement in self-image, and better relationships within the work environment. Negative repercussions include unmet needs, refusal of assistance, diminished self-perception, regret over disclosure, and negative/discriminatory behavior from colleagues or managers, particularly in highly stereotyped jobs (e.g., Law enforcement).

conclusionThe scoping review highlights the repercussions of disclosing mental health conditions in the workplace and their specific implications for organizations, managers and employees. Recommendations for improving the impact of mental health conditions disclosure in the workplace are proposed.

Indexed as

DisclosureMental DisordersMental HealthWorkplaceHumansDisclosureDisclosure outcomeMental healthMental health conditionsWork

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.