ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Disclosure Impact of Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace: A Scoping Review and a Thematic Analysis.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational health challenges in commercial diving: a qualitative study of psychological risk, training gaps, and organisational responsibilities.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2026Article
- Working with a Chronic Health Condition: Is Choosing Not to Disclose the Same as Hiding Information?Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Workplace Outcomes After Mental Health Disclosure: The Critical Influence of Supervisor Reactions.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Article
- What are the steps to resolution taken by key stakeholders following a case of workplace bullying: A scoping review.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDisclosing one's mental health conditions in the workplace is essential for accessing accommodations, but it can also bring negative consequences. This scoping review aims at collecting positive and negative impacts of disclosing mental health conditions in the workplace, with the hope of better supporting employees and organizations facing mental health disclosure at work.
methodWe conducted a synthesis of studies published between March 2000 and February 2025. Selected articles needed to address disclosure and mental health conditions in the workplace, from the perspective of employees, managers or organizations. Study biases were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Comparison. Articles were reviewed following principles of thematic analysis.
resultsThe 71 included studies reflect the range of impacts of mental health conditions disclosure. In total, 5 overarching themes and 12 themes were generated for the positive outcomes, whereas 6 overarching themes and 19 themes were identified for the negative outcomes. Those themes reflected both individual and organizational perspectives. Positive responses include receiving accommodations, advocacy engagement, improvement in self-image, and better relationships within the work environment. Negative repercussions include unmet needs, refusal of assistance, diminished self-perception, regret over disclosure, and negative/discriminatory behavior from colleagues or managers, particularly in highly stereotyped jobs (e.g., Law enforcement).
conclusionThe scoping review highlights the repercussions of disclosing mental health conditions in the workplace and their specific implications for organizations, managers and employees. Recommendations for improving the impact of mental health conditions disclosure in the workplace are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40192917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.