ReviewPlanta2025
The invisible cytomixis: how a cytological phenomenon can be misinterpreted or totally overlooked.
Review in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid chromosome movements persist within nuclear protrusions in Arabidopsis thaliana meiocytes.Protoplasma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThis review discusses how technical limitations of microscopic techniques as well as cognitive distortions of researchers hinder progress in the study of the phenomenon of cytomixis. The key element of any cytological work remains the interpretation of obtained data. Owing to technical limitations, cognitive distortions, and limited knowledge of the object under study, distorted or false conclusions can be made. One prominent example of such distorted perception in plant meiosis studies is the phenomenon of cytomixis: migration of nuclei between male meiocytes. In this review, we discuss cases from published articles where cytomixis has been misinterpreted because of limitations of the microscopic techniques used. Furthermore, we highlight papers where intercellular nuclear migration has been repeatedly documented but also repeatedly overlooked. This "learning from mistakes" approach may help researchers in the field to view their data from different perspectives and to find additional possible interpretations of an observed cytological picture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40192843What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.