Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192822›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025

Porous threaded titanium implant screws have higher insertional torque compared to standard screws.

Andrew P Collins, Stephen J Wallace, Graham J DeKeyser, David W Polly, Reza Firoozabadi

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew P CollinsUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA. andrewpc@uw.edu.
Stephen J WallaceSummit Orthopaedics, Lake Oswego, USA.
Graham J DeKeyserOregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA.
David W PollyUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Reza FiroozabadiUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA. rezaf2@uw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePosterior pelvic ring screw back out and loss of fixation may result from poor screw purchase, prevalent in geriatric pelvic ring injuries where the cancellous bone is often osteoporotic. To reduce screw back out, there has been increasing use of porous threaded titanium implant (PTTI) screws for posterior pelvic fixation rather than standard cannulated, buttress threaded screws. This study aims to assess the insertional torque of PTTI screws compared to standard cannulated screws as there is limited evidence regarding the biomechanical fixation profiles among screws.

methodsFifteen orthopedic trauma surgeons inserted screws into a validated surrogate for osteoporotic cancellous bone. Insertional torque was measured during screw placement in three separate scenarios for each surgeon: (1) placement of a standard 7.3 mm (mm) screw into a new bone model, (2) placement of a PTTI screw into a new bone model, and (3) placement of a PTTI screw through a previously placed 7.3 mm screw hole from which it was removed (rescue screw). The insertional torque was calculated across all surgeons and analyses were conducted comparing scenarios (1) and (2), and (1) and (3).

resultsThe average insertional torque of 7.3 mm screws was 0.358 ± 0.223 Nm, and the maximum insertional torque was 0.627 ± 0.365 Nm. The average insertional torque for the PTTI screws was 0.929 ± 0.551 Nm, 2.59 times more than that of the 7.3 mm screw (p < 0.001) while the maximum insertional torque was 1.877 ± 0.671 Nm, 2.99 times that of the standard screw (p < 0.001). When placed into the prior 7.3 mm screw hole (rescue), the PTTI screws generated an average insertional torque of 0.711 ± 0.405, still 1.99 times greater than that of the 7.3 mm screw (p < 0.001), and maximum torque of 1.607 ± 0.427 Nm, 2.56 times greater than the standard screw (p < 0.001).

conclusionSignificantly greater maximum and average insertional torque were generated with the PTTI screws compared to the standard screws, even when used as a rescue screw in cancellous bone models. Further studies assessing clinical outcomes and failure rates with PTTI screws will better define their clinical utility.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsCancellous BoneFracture Fixation, InternalProsthesis DesignTorqueBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansModels, AnatomicOrthopedic SurgeonsOsteoporosisPorosityTitaniumTitaniumBiomechanicsInsertional torquePelvic ring injuryPelvic traumaPercutaneous fixationSI bone porous threaded implants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.