ArticleReproduction (Cambridge, England)2025
Histomorphometry and sperm quality in male rats exposed to 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi.
Article in Reproduction (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Effects of 3.5 GHz and 24 GHz 5G Radiofrequency Exposure on Male Sexual Behaviour and Reproductive Endocrine Function in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- The Effect of 2.45 GHz Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Components of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal Axis in Male Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Testicular Heat-Shock Protein Expression in Rats Following 3.5 GHz and 24 GHz RF-EMF Exposure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In brief: Numerous studies have examined the impact of 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure on the testes, highlighting concerns about its potential effects on male fertility. This study extends the investigation beyond the testes to include the epididymis, seminal vesicle and coagulating gland, providing a more comprehensive understanding of how 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi influences the male reproductive system. Abstract: Numerous studies have documented the effect of 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure on the testes and sperm quality. Nevertheless, detailed histological alterations of other male reproductive organs are underexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate detailed histological alterations of the testes, epididymis, seminal vesicle, coagulating organ and sperm parameters following 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure. Eighteen adult male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 18) were equally divided into three groups (n = 6): control, 4 h and 24 h groups. The groups were exposed to an active router daily for 4 or 24 h, respectively. The control group was sham-exposed using an inactive router. The exposure lasted for 8 weeks at a 20 cm distance, with a power density of 0.141 W/m2 and a specific absorption rate of 0.41 W/Kg. Histological findings revealed vacuolation in the testes and the corpus epididymis of the 4 and 24 h groups. The seminal vesicle in both exposed groups exhibited multifocal atypical hyperplasia. Besides, the seminiferous tubule diameter decreased gradually in both exposed groups, with a substantial decrease in the 24 h group. The spermatogenesis index in 4 and 24 h groups also reduced significantly. The latter result was reflected in the sperm concentration, where both groups showed a significant reduction compared to the control group. Sperm motility also decreased significantly in the 4 h groups. Interestingly, there was a substantial increase in sperm viability in the 24 h group. These findings indicate that 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure causes changes in the histology and histomorphometry measurement and impairs important sperm parameters. This highlights the consequences following Wi-Fi exposure on male reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.