ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Real-life benefit of artificial intelligence-based fracture detection in a pediatric emergency department.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Enhanced fracture detection on radiographs with AI assistance for clinicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in virtual fracture clinics: a systematic review of imaging and clinical-text tools.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy & clinical importance of AI confidence for extremity fracture detection: 2,508-patient retrospective cohort.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models for detecting wrist and distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Multivendor comparison study of artificial intelligence software for automated fracture detection in paediatric patients.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Small lesion-high risk: diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in paediatric fractures with medicolegal impact.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Competencies and Educational Needs Among ERNICA Members: Results of a Multinational Survey.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric fracture detection: impact on diagnostic revisions and patient recall rates in a tertiary emergency setting.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Multi-Class Pediatric Wrist Fracture Subtype Classification: A Pilot Study Comparing Convolutional Neural Network Architectures.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Latest Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models in General Pediatric Surgery.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026Review
- Digital Eye: Deep Learning for Detecting Physeal Fractures of the Pediatric Distal Radius.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- [Artificial intelligence in fracture diagnostics : Potentials and challenges in the clinical practice].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Radiological Imaging for Bone Fracture Diagnosis.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software for fracture detection in pediatric patients within a real-life clinical setting. Specifically, it sought to assess (1) the stand-alone AI performance in real-life cohort and in selected set of medicolegal relevant fractures and (2) its influence on the diagnostic performance of inexperienced emergency room physicians. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe retrospective study involved 1672 radiographs of children under 18 years, obtained consecutively (real-life cohort) and selective (medicolegal cohort) in a tertiary pediatric emergency department. On these images, the stand-alone performance of a commercially available, deep learning-based software was determined. Additionally, three pediatric residents independently reviewed the radiographs before and after AI assistance, and the impact on their diagnostic accuracy was assessed.
resultsIn our cohort (median age 10.9 years, 59% male), the AI demonstrated a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 83%, and accuracy of 87%. For medicolegally relevant fractures, the AI achieved a sensitivity of 100% for proximal tibia fractures, but only 68% for radial condyle fractures. AI assistance improved the residents' patient-wise sensitivity from 84 to 87%, specificity from 91 to 92%, and diagnostic accuracy from 88 to 90%. In 2% of cases, the readers, with the assistance of AI, erroneously discarded their correct diagnosis.
conclusionThe AI exhibited strong stand-alone performance in a pediatric setting and can modestly enhance the diagnostic accuracy of inexperienced physicians. However, the economic implications must be weighed against the potential benefits in patient safety. KEY POINTS: Question Does an artificial intelligence-based software for fracture detection influence inexperienced physicians in a real-life pediatric trauma population? Findings Addition of a well-performing artificial intelligence-based software led to a limited increase in diagnostic accuracy of inexperienced human readers. Clinical relevance Diagnosing fractures in children is especially challenging for less experienced physicians. High-performing artificial intelligence-based software as a "second set of eyes," enhances diagnostic accuracy in a common pediatric emergency room setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.