ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Skull CT metadata for automatic bone age assessment by using three-dimensional deep learning framework.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone age assessment (BAA) means challenging tasks in forensic science especially in some extreme situations like only skulls found. This study aimed to develop an accurate three-dimensional deep learning (DL) framework at skull CT metadata for BAA and try to explore new skull markers. In this study, retrospective data of 385,175 Skull CT slices from 1,085 patients ranging from 16.32 to 90.56 years were obtained. The cohort was randomly split into a training set (90%, N = 976) and a test set (10%, N = 109). Additional 101 patients were collected from another center as an external validation set. Evaluations and comparisons with other state-of-the-art DL models and traditional machine learning (ML) models based on hand-crafted methods were hierarchically performed. The mean absolute error (MAE) was the primary parameter. A total of 1186 patients (mean age ± SD: 54.72 ± 14.91, 603 males & 583 females) were evaluated. Our method achieved the best MAE on the training set, test set and external validation set were 6.51, 5.70, and 8.86 years in males, while in females, the best MAE were 6.10, 7.84, and 10.56 years, respectively. In the test set, the MAE of other 2D or 3D models and ML methods based on manual features were ranged from 10.12 to 14.12. The model results showed a tendency of larger errors in the elderly group. The results suggested the proposed three-dimensional DL framework performed better than existing DL and manual methods. Furthermore, our framework explored new skeletal markers for BAA and could serve as a backbone for extracting features from three-dimensional skull CT metadata in a professional manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40192774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.