Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192712›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of medicine and philosophy2025

The Morality of Assisted Dying.

Stephen Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen RichardsThe University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This essay analyzes the morality of assisted dying. To do this, it is necessary to recognize that assisted dying is the outworking of a larger process. This process unavoidably begins with the key moral conception of human dignity. Emphasis upon individualism in society has caused a restructuring of the dignity concept, changing what is most highly valued. This altered concept of dignity gives rise to assisted dying, yet is morally flawed. This is because it is an understanding of dignity that minimizes people's vulnerability, dismisses coercive forces that are brought into effect, encourages undue confidence in safeguards, and removes any sustained basis for respect of the individual. Autonomy, as the primary justification for assisted dying in contemporary society, is an abbreviated understanding of the restructured concept of dignity and therefore subject to the same criticisms. Assisted dying arises from a deficient and self-defeating foundation that mark it as immoral.

Indexed as

MoralsRight to DieSuicide, AssistedHumansPersonal AutonomyPersonhoodPhilosophy, Medicalassisted dyingautonomydignityeuthanasiamorality

Identifiers

PMID40192712
PMCPMC12279015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.