ReviewChemMedChem2025
Is Mycobacterial InhA a Suitable Target for Rational Drug Design?
Review in ChemMedChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing the Antibiotic Potency and Metabolic Stability of Pyridomycin Using a Semisynthetic Approach.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
InhA, an NAD-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase, is involved in the biosynthesis of mycolic acids, specific lipids to mycobacteria. InhA is the target of isoniazid, a first-line antituberculosis drug used since the 1950s. Isoniazid is a prodrug that needs to be activated by the catalase-peroxidase KatG. Due to resistance problems, a substantial amount of work has been carried out to identify or design direct inhibitors of InhA, demonstrating that this enzyme is still considered a relevant target for the discovery of new antituberculosis drugs. Much of this work included the resolution of crystallographic structures. Indeed, over a hundred structures have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank for different forms of the enzyme (apo, holo, and complexes), demonstrating a real crystalline polymorphism. Taken together, these structures constitute a valuable dataset. However, the complete decoding of the enzyme's properties and its inhibition literally comes up against its molecular plasticity at the level of a motif essential to the definition of the active site: the substrate-binding loop. In this article, a detailed analysis of this structural dataset is proposed, describing in particular the different families of inhibitors and attempting to establish structural links of causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.