Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192174›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Reflexivity in Heideggerian Hermeneutic Phenomenology: The Hermeneutic Phenomenological Circle.

Ken Hok Man Ho, Daphne Sze Ki Cheung, Sharon Bourke, David Edvardsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ken Hok Man HoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4934-2450
Daphne Sze Ki CheungSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-9352
Sharon BourkeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-7641
David EdvardssonDepartment of Nursing, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8787-2327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo discuss reflexivity for conducting hermeneutic phenomenology and to present the hermeneutic phenomenological circle.

designDiscussion paper.

methodsWe employed data on the lived experience of loneliness of older adults in residential care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic to demonstrate the reflexivity required for hermeneutic phenomenology. We showcased a reflective process grounded in Heidegger's notions of Being and temporality to uncover the context of meaningfulness and its temporal influence on being.

resultsWe proposed a hermeneutic phenomenological circle encompassing four relations passing between Being, the interpreter and being. The circle was successfully applied to demonstrate the reflexivity required to conduct hermeneutic phenomenology.

conclusionsEngaging in reflexivity requires the researcher to develop knowledge about the philosophy of hermeneutic phenomenology. The hermeneutic phenomenological circle facilitates researchers in anchoring their reflections in Being and temporality. IMPLICATIONS: The hermeneutic phenomenological circle serves as a useful tool for researchers/health professionals to learn hermeneutic phenomenology and to facilitate researchers/health professionals at all career stages to engage in reflexivity.

Indexed as

COVID-19HermeneuticsLonelinessAgedFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2hermeneuticlonelinessolder adultsphenomenologyqualitativereflexivity

Identifiers

PMID40192174
PMCPMC12721953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.