Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40192160›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2025

Safety of Avacopan for the Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Combined Data From Three Clinical Trials.

Peter A Merkel, Michael D George, Huibin Yue, Tamara Popov, Andreas Kronbichler, Mark A Little, David R W Jayne

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01363388 phase2completednot on this map

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 in Subjects With Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis on Background of Cyclophosphamide or Rituximab Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2011 to 2016Enrolled67ConditionsVasculitisArmsPlacebo, CCX168
NCT02222155 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Assessment Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 in Subjects With Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2015 to 2016Enrolled42ConditionsANCA-associated VasculitisArmsCCX168 10 mg, twice daily, plus cyclophosphamide/rituximab plus glucocorticoids, CCX168 30 mg, twice daily, cyclophosphamide/rituximab plus glucocorticoids, Placebo, twice daily, plus cyclophosphamide/rituximab plus glucocorticoids
NCT02994927 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 (Avacopan) in Patients With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2017 to 2019Enrolled331ConditionsANCA-Associated VasculitisArmsAvacopan, Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide, Rituximab, Azathioprine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Making use of avacopan in clinical practice.Clinical kidney journal · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter A MerkelUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-7345
Michael D GeorgeUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0398-2308
Huibin YueAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.
Tamara PopovCSL Vifor, Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
Andreas KronbichlerMedical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mark A LittleTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8491-6504
David R W JayneUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-0637

Funding

Chemocentryx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to report the safety of avacopan, an oral selective complement C5a receptor antagonist, using pooled data from clinical trials in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis [GPA] or microscopic polyangiitis [MPA]).

methodsData were included from two phase 2 (CLEAR [NCT01363388] and CLASSIC [NCT02222155]) and one phase 3 (ADVOCATE [NCT02994927]) double-blind randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of avacopan with active non-avacopan control regimens to induce remission in patients with GPA or MPA. In CLEAR and ADVOCATE, avacopan-treated patients received either no or lower doses of study-supplied prednisone than the control groups; in CLASSIC, all groups received the same dose of study-supplied prednisone. Assessments included rates of exposure-adjusted adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs of special interest.

resultsOverall, 439 patients with GPA or MPA (avacopan: n = 239; non-avacopan: n = 200) were included. The exposure-adjusted rates of AEs, SAEs, white blood cell (WBC) count reductions, and infections were lower with avacopan versus control (between-group differences in rate per 100 patient-years -151.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) -218.6 to -85.3], -20.8 [95% CI -38.3 to -3.3], -11.6 [95% CI -22.2 to -1.2], and -24.3 [95% CI -48.5 to -0.1], respectively). SAEs associated with hepatic function abnormalities occurred in 4.4% of the avacopan group and 2.8% of the control group.

conclusionIn clinical trials of GPA or MPA, use of avacopan was associated with fewer AEs, SAEs, and WBC count reductions and fewer infections than non-avacopan treatment. Safety data support the use of avacopan in patients with GPA or MPA.

Identifiers

PMID40192160
PMCPMC11973930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.