ReviewConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025
Opportunities, research gaps, and risks in allogenic ecosystem engineer mimicry.
Review in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Opportunities, research gaps, and risks in allogenic ecosystem engineer mimicry.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an age of anthropogenically driven species loss and increasingly novel ecosystems, ecosystem engineer restoration is a process-based approach to supporting ecosystem function. Many ecosystem engineers have low or declining population sizes. When feasibility and costs impede reintroduction of ecosystem engineers, an alternative may be artificial mimicry of ecosystem engineer structures. Research on mimicry of autogenetic ecosystem engineers, whose physical structure shapes habitat availability and complexity (e.g., tropical corals whose hard skeletons create complex reefs that provide habitat), spans many process scales. However, mimicry of allogenic ecosystem engineers, which shape habitat availability through their behavior (e.g., beavers building dams that influence hydrology), is less well explored. We reviewed the literature to examine the efficacy of artificial mimicry of allogenic ecosystem engineers and gaps in the research. Emerging findings suggest that artificial mimicry could restore physical processes, support focal species, alter biological communities, deliver benefits to landowners and ecosystems, and promote population recovery. However, some studies document the potential for unintended negative consequences for ecosystem engineers or species that use engineered structures or respond to environmental cues produced by engineered structures. Topics requiring additional research include assessing the efficacy of artificial structures as compared with natural structures, evaluating the scalability and cost-effectiveness of mimicry projects, and investigating the potential for unintended consequences with mimicked structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.